Risk management analysis of public street lighting (SMART PJU) as Quick win smart environment of Semarang City

Singgih  Manggalou; Binti  Azizatun Nafi’ah; Yulinda  Uang

doi:10.46729/ijstm.v4i5.950

Singgih Manggalou Department of Public Administration (UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur), Indonesia
Binti Azizatun Nafi’ah Department of Public Administration (UPN “Veteran” Jawa Timur), Indonesia
Yulinda Uang Universitas Halmahera, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v4i5.950

Keywords: Smart City; Internet of Things s; SMART PJU analytics; and Risk Management.

Abstract

Successful implementation of a program is the goal of program design. However, currently, many programs fail to be implemented due to the failure of efforts to prevent the occurrence of failure factors. Especially in the era of digital governance such as today, the planning of various smart city programs has a large potential risk of implementation failure. The Semarang City of Smart PJU, for example, the implementation of the use of analytics-based SMART PJU requires long and careful preparation. Not only management preparation but risk management is also needed for the program. This research aims to analyze the map of potential risks in the Semarang City SMART PJU of IoT program along with analyzing how the risk management of the program. This research is based on qualitative research with primary and secondary data collection techniques. Primary data collection by interviewing related informants purposively, then the data is analyzed based on qualitative analysis. The findings of this research are that the highest level of risk occurs in the shortage of human resources and SMART PJU operators because there are no human resources who are data analytic experts and Artificial Intelligence experts. Other high risks are database errors / down; SMART PJU devices using old technology; long loading dashboards; and no Fiber Optic connection in internet management.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alam, E., & Ray-Bennett, N. S. (2021). Disaster risk governance for district-level landslide risk management in Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 59, 102220.

Alcaide-Muñoz, L., Rodríguez-Bolívar, M. P., Cobo, M. J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Analysing the scientiﬁc evolution of e-Government using a science mapping approach. Gov. Inf. Q, 34, 545–555.

Yusrita, Y., Fahmi, N. A., Yudha, T. K., & Nasution, I. (2020). Capabilities, Commitments and Effect on the Competitiveness of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) in Medan. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 3(3), 2442-2450.

Alhawari, S., Karadsheh, L., Nehari, T., & Mansour, E. (2012). Knowledge-Based Risk Management framework for Information Technology project. International Journal of Information Management, 32(1), 50–65.

Bellini, P., Nesi, P., & Pantaleo, G. (2022). IoT-Enabled Smart Cities: A Review of Concepts, Frameworks and Key Technologies. Applied Sciences, 12(3), 1607. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12031607

Supriadi, ., Dalimunthe, R. F., Lumbanraja, P., & Tarmizi, H. B. (2021). The Antecedent Of Educational Staff Contextual Performance In Medan City Private Universities. Archives of Business Research, 9(2), 316–338. https://doi.org/10.14738/abr.92.9817

Bokhari, S. A. A., & Myeong, S. (2022). Use of Artificial Intelligence in Smart Cities for Smart Decision-Making: A Social Innovation Perspective. Sustainability, 14(2), 620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020620

Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. J. Urban Techno, 18, 65–82.

Cedergren,A.,Hassel,H.,& Tehler, H. (2022).Tracking the implementation of a risk management process in a public sector organisation–A longitudinal study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction,81, 103257..

Sarkum, S., Syamsuri, A. R., & Supriadi, S. (2020). The role of multi-actor engagement. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 176.

Cienfuegos Spikin, I. (2013). Risk Management theory: The integrated perspective and its application in the public sector. Revista Estado, Gobierno y Gestión Pública, 0(21). https://doi.org/10.5354/0717-6759.2013.29402

Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Cantador, I., & Bolívar, M. P. R. (2021). Analyzing citizen participation and engagement in European smart cities. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., 39, 592–626.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th Edition ed.). Sage Publishing.

Fernandes, G., Domingues, J., Tereso, A., & Pinto, E. (2021). A Stakeholders’ Perspective on Risk Management for Collaborative University-Industry R&D Programs. Procedia Computer Science, 181, 110–118.

Tarigan, N. M. R., Sasongko, W. D., & Abdullah, Y. (2021). Co-Creation Through Entrepreneurial Marketing: A Study At The Creative Industries. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(5), 1-8.

Manzoni, J., & Cheshire, S. lan. (2017). Management of Risk in Government: A framework for biards and examples of what has warked in practice.

Ministry of Finance.(2019).Risk Management Guideline for the B.C.Public Sector.Province of British Columbia.

Oduoza, C. F. (2020). Framework for Sustainable Risk Management in the Manufacturing Sector. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1290–1297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.180

Peixoto, J., Tereso, A., Fernandes, G., & Almeida, R. (2014). Project Risk Management Methodology: A Case Study of an Electric Energy Organization. Procedia Technology, 16, 1096–1105.

Project Management Institute. (2017). A Guide to Project Management Body of Knowledge PMBoK Guide (6th ed.). PMI.

Tarigan, N. M. R., Syahputra, R. A., & Yudha, T. K. (2022). The Analysis of Quality of Work Life and Work Achievement in Department of Agriculture Simalungun Regency. SIASAT, 7(1), 55-70.

Purnomo, M. H. P. F. (2016). Smart City Indicators: A Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 8(3), 161–164.

Putri, N. E., Helmi, H., Noer, M., & Yossyafra, Y. (2021). Risk Analysis and Potential Benefits of Infrastructure Development. MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 37(2).

Rivera,J.,Ceesay,A.A.,&Sillah,A.(2020). Challenges to disaster risk management in The Gambia: A preliminary investigation of the disaster management system’s structure. Progress in Disaster Science, 6, 100075.

Simonofski,A.,Asensio, E. S., & Wautelet, Y. (2019). Citizen participation in the design of smart cities: Methods and management framework. Smart Cities Issues Chall. Mapp. Polit. Soc. Econ. Risks Threat., 1, 49–62.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R&D. CV. Alfabeta.

Szarek-Iwaniuk, P., & Senetra, A. (2020). Access to ICT in Poland and the co-creation of urban space in the process of modern social participation in a smart city—A case study. Sustainability, 12, 2136.

Thomas, V., Wang, D., Mullagh, L., & Dunn, N. (2016). Where’s Wally? In search of citizen perspectives on the smart city. Sustainability, 8, 207.

Wawer, M., Grzesiuk, K., & Jegorow, D. (2022). Smart Mobility in a Smart City in the Context of Generation Z Sustainability, Use of ICT, and Participation. Energies, 15(13), 4651. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134651

Zainal, Z., Rambey, R. R., & Rahman, K. (2021). Governance of Household Waste Management in Pekanbaru City. MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v37i2.7947

Simamora, R. N. H., & Elviani, S. (2022). Carbon emission disclosure in Indonesia: Viewed from the aspect of board of directors, managerial ownership, and audit committee. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 1-9.