Indonesia's Marine Economic Potential As A Maritime Country:

Hastuti Hastuti; Amiruddin   Muhidu; Rastin Rastin; Eliyanti  Agus Mokodompit

doi:10.46729/ijstm.v4i4.897

Hastuti Hastuti Doctoral Program in Management Science Halu Oleo University Graduate Program, Indonesia.
Amiruddin Muhidu Doctoral Program in Management Science Halu Oleo University Graduate Program, Indonesia.
Rastin Rastin Doctoral Program in Management Science Halu Oleo University Graduate Program, Indonesia
Eliyanti Agus Mokodompit Doctoral Program in Management Science Halu Oleo University Graduate Program, Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v4i4.897

Keywords: Marine Business Potential, Marine Economy and Maritime State.

Abstract

This nation has economic potential that is no less flashy and dazzling in terms of natural resources
and the environment. The main purpose of this article is to emphasise the importance of Indonesia's
marine economic potential as a maritime country in achieving Indonesia's prosperity and glory as a
maritime country. Fisheries, marine tourism, marine transportation, offshore energy and mineral
resources, marine industry, marine buildings, and marine services are all goals for the marine
economic spectrum. This marine resource's potential economic value is estimated to be at least $8.22
trillion per year. This article was written using qualitative and descriptive literature studies. A
literature review was used as the research method to analyse the journal. Reviewing related libraries
is what a literature review entails. (Review of related literature/review of literature) The findings
indicate that the Indonesian government already has a policy in place for Indonesia's marine strategy,
which refers to Indonesia's Development Vision, which is contained in Law Number 17 of 2007
concerning the National Long-Term Development Plan 2005-2025 and Law Number 32 of 2014
concerning Marine. This policy is reflected in a number of concepts, including Blue Economy,
Maritime Domain Awareness, World Maritime Axis, and Nusantara Insight. To realise Indonesia as
an independent, advanced, and strong archipelagic country based on national interests, this great
potential must be managed and utilised holistically, integrated thematically, and distributed spatially
proportionally through an integrated development planning process supported by harmonious spatial
planning and the implementation of sustainable development that can run in harmony.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ruzicka J, Brodeur RD, Cieciel K, Decker MB. Examining the ecological role of jellyfish in the Eastern Bering

Sea. ICES J Mar Sci. 2020;77(2):791–802.

Dahuri R. Keanekaragaman hayati laut: aset pembangunan berkelanjutan Indonesia / Rokhmin Dahuri. In 2003.

Colgan CS. The ocean economy of the United States: Measurement, distribution, & trends. Ocean Coast Manag.

;71:334–43.

KKP KK dan P no 45 ; 2018. Rencana Induk Pelabuhan Perikanan Nasional. Keputusan Menteri Kelaut Dan

Perikan Republik Indones Nomor 45/Kepmen-Kp/2014. 2018;1–74.

Park D, Kildow D. Rebuilding the Classification System of the Ocean Economy. J Ocean Coast Econ. 2015 Feb

;2014.

Colgan EG, Furman B, Gaynes M, Graham WS, LaBianca NC, Magerlein JH, et al. A practical implementation

of silicon microchannel coolers for high power chips. IEEE Trans Components Packag Technol.

;30(2):218–25.

Budiardjo M. DASAR-DASAR ILMU POLITIK.

Bossuyt P, Louis E, Mary JY, Vermeire S, Bouhnik Y. Defining endoscopic remission in ileocolonic Crohn’s

disease: Let’s start from scratch. Vol. 12, Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis. 2018. 1245–1248 p.

Jennifer M. Hinkel, MSc , Arka Ray B. ON VALUE, OUTCOMES, AND DATA: WHY AREN’T

TRADITIONAL ECONOMIC APPROACHES EASILY SOLVING the “BIG PROBLEMS”? 2020;1–7.

Sapanli K, Kusumastanto T, Budiharsono S, Sadelie A. Dinamika Dan Kebijakan Pengembangan Ekonomi

Kelautan Indonesia. J Kebijak Sos Ekon Kelaut dan Perikan. 2020;10(2):117.

OECD. OECD Economic Outlook. Rapport final. 2006. 1–236 p.

Xu S, Gao K. Green finance and high-quality development of marine economy. Mar Econ Manag.

;5(2):213–27.

D’Ambra I, Graham WM, Carmichael RH, Hernandez FJ. Dietary overlap between jellyfish and forage fish in

the northern Gulf of Mexico. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2018;587:31–40.

Beller J, Stoll S. A moral reasoning intervention program for student athletes. Athl Acad J. 1992;(Spring):43–57.

Liu Y, Jiang Y, Pei Z, Han L, Shao H, Jiang Y, et al. Coordinated Development of the Marine Environment and

the Marine Fishery Economy in China, 2011–2020. Fishes. 2022;7(6):2011–20.

International Journal Of Science, Technology & Management ISSN: 2722 - 4015

http://ijstm.inarah.co.id

Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, et al. Coral reefs under rapid

climate change and ocean acidification. Science. 2007;318(5857):1737–42.

Lateef TM, Merikangas KR, He J, Kalaydjian A, Khoromi S, Knight E, et al. Headache in a national sample of

American children: prevalence and comorbidity. J Child Neurol. 2009 May;24(5):536–43.

Kusumastanto T. Reposisi" ocean policy" dalam pembangunan ekonomi Indonesia di era otonomi daerah.

Institut Pertanian Bogor; 2002.

Lasswell H, Kaplan A, Brunner RD. Power And Society: A Framework for Politicai inquiry. Power and Society:

A Framework for Political Inquiry. 2017. 1–295 p.

Open Government Indonesia. Laporan Pelaksanaan Open Government Indonesia Tahun 2012. Lap Pelaks Open

Gov Indones Tahun 2012. 2012;

Aksnes DL, Utne ACW. A revised model of visual range in fish. Sarsia. 1997;82(2):137–47.

Braswell M, Fuller J, Lozoff B. Transforming Institutions, Growth, and Quality of Life. Corrections,

Peacemaking and Restorative Justice. 2021. 81–96 p.

Park S, Kim S. Is sustainable online learning possible with gamification?—the effect of gamified online learning

on student learning. Sustain [Internet]. 2021;13(8). Available from:

https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-

&doi=10.3390%2Fsu13084267&partnerID=40&md5=9055094bd666236cc018ff2f711f7f91

Colgan CS. Measurement of the Ocean Economy From National Income Accounts to the Sustainable Blue

Economy. J Ocean Coast Econ. 2016;2(2).

Sutardjo SC.Kebijakan Pembangunan Kelautan Dan Perikanan Ke Depan. J Kebijak Perikan Ind. 2014:37–42.

World Development Report 2007. World Development Report 2007. 2006.

Waluyo A. Secara Terpadu Yang Berbasis Masyarakat ( Studi Kasus Pulau Raas Kabupaten Sumenep Madura ).

;7(2):75–85.

Yani YM, Montratama I. Indonesia Sebagai Poros Maritim Dunia: Suatu Tinjauan Geopolitik. J Pertahanan

Bela Negara. 2018;5(2):25–52.

Crespo GO, Dunn DC. A review of the impacts of fisheries on open-ocean ecosystems. ICES J Mar Sci.

;74(9):2283–97.

Marwan Efendi dan Miranti Yudhati. PENGARUH EKSPEKTASI LABA TERHADAP MINAT

BERWIRAUSAHA [Internet]. Vol. 3, Jurnal AKP│. 2017. p. 87. Available from:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.106%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114422%0Ahttp://dx.do

i.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.11.016%0Ahttp://www.ansr.pt/Estatisticas/RelatoriosDeSinistralidade/Pages/defau

lt.aspx%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.

MARDIANSYAH. EKOSISTEM SUMBER DAYA HAYATI PESISIR DAN LAUT, DALAM

PENGELOLAAN WILAYAH PESISIR DI PROVINSI BENGKULU. 2020.

Ding L, Kinnucan HW. This document is discoverable and free to researchers across the globe due to the work

of AgEcon Search . Help ensure our sustainability . J Gender, Agric Food Secur. 2011;1(3):1–22.

Lasabuda R. Pembangunan Wilayah Pesisir Dan Lautan Dalam Perspektif Negara Kepulauan Republik

Indonesia. J Ilm Platax. 2013;1(2):92.