Validity and Reliability of the Adoption Questionnaire of Agricultural Mechanization in the Food Estate Area of Central Kalimantan Indonesia

Astri Anto; Sugiyanto Sugiyanto; Yayuk  Yuliati; Asihing  Kustanti

doi:10.46729/ijstm.v4i4.855

Astri Anto Postgraduate student of the Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Department of Extension and Communication of Agricultural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Yayuk Yuliati Department of Extension and Communication of Agricultural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.
Asihing Kustanti Department of Extension and Communication of Agricultural Development, Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang, Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v4i4.855

Keywords: Validity, Reliability, Adoption, Agricultural Mechanization and Food Estate

Abstract

The use of agricultural mechanization has greatly contributed to the modernization of agricultural systems in many developing countries, including Indonesia. One implementation of agricultural modernization is the application of agricultural mechanization in the food estate program in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. The adoption of agricultural mechanization is a determinant of the implementation of agricultural mechanization in the food estate area. However, the problem is that the speed of adoption of agricultural mechanization by farmers in the food estate area is still varied. The purpose of this research is to test the validity and reliability of the questionnaire in the study of agricultural mechanization adoption to support agricultural modernization in the food estate area of Central Kalimantan. This research was conducted using a quantitative research design with rice farmers who received the food estate program as the unit of analysis in the Pulang Pisau and Kapuas districts, Central Kalimantan. Data was collected purposively from 42 rice farmers in the food estate area by providing a questionnaire containing five indicators of agricultural mechanization adoption. The results showed that the questionnaires were valid and reliable with correlation values (Pearson Correlation) for the five indicators of awareness, interest, evaluation, trial, and adoption with fifteen questions showing the value of R count > R table and declared valid. While Cronbach's Alpha value is 0.794-0.951. Meanwhile, Cronbach's Alpha value was 0.794-0.951. Based on the discussion, it can be concluded that the questionnaire is valid and reliable.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Quan, X.; Doluschitz, R., Factors Influencing the Adoption of Agricultural Machinery by Chinese Maize Farmers, Agriculture 2021, 11, 1090. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agriculture11111090, 2021, pp. 1-11.

R. Hegazy, A. Schmidley, E. Bautista, D. Sumunistrado, M. Gummert, and A. Elepaño., Mechanization in rice farming : lessons learned from other countries. Asia Rice Foundation Forum-2013, Mechanization in rice farming: status, challenges, and opportunities. The Bureau of Soils and Water Management (BSWM) Auditorium, Quezon City, 22nd November 2013.

Umar, S dan Trip Alihamsyah, Mekanisasi Pertanian di Lahan Rawa Pasang Surut. ISBN: 978-602-344-005-4. IAARD Press. Jakarta, 2019.

Kadhung Prayoga, Suryani Nurfadillah, Manna Saragih, Adietya Muhammad Riezky. Menakar Perubahan Sosio-Kultural Masyarakat Tani Akibat Miskonsepsi Modernisasi Pembangunan Pertanian, SOCA, Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian dan Agribisnis. Vol.13No.128, Februari 2019, pp. 96-114

Ujang Paman, Saipul Bahri, Asrol, Khairizal, Hajry Arief Wahyudy, Farm Machinery Development and Utilization System Policies for Small-Scale Rice Farming, International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering Information Technology. Vol.8. N0.3, 2018, pp. 701-707.

Firdaus dan Ardi, Pemanfaatan Mekanisasi Alsintan dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Usaha Penangkaran Benih Padi di Kabupaten Tanjung Jabung Barat Provinsi Jambi, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, Volume 5 Nomor 2 Desember 2021, E-ISSN: 2580-2259, 2021.

Biro Perencanaan Kementan, Grand Design Pengembangan Kawasan Food Estate Berbasis Korporasi Petani di Lahan Rawa Kalimantan Tengah, Biro Perencanaan Kementerian Pertanian, Jakarta, 2020.

Setiyanto. A, Strategi Pengelolaan Alsintan Bantuan Pemerintah dalam Peningkatan Produksi Tanaman Pangan, Laporan hasil kegiatan Pusat Sosial Ekonomi dan Kebijakan Pertanian (PSEKP) Kementerian Pertanian, Bogor, 2020.

Fahmid, I.M.; Wahyudi; Adang Agustian; Rizma Aldilah dan Endro Gunawan, The Potential Swamp Land Development to Support Food Estates Programmes in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, Environment and Urbanization ASIA. National Institute of Urban Affairs (NIUA), 2022, pp. 1-12.

Brown, B; Gokul P. Paudel and Timothy J. Krupnik, Visualising adoption processes through a stepwise framework: A case study of mechanisation on the Nepal Terai, Agricultural Systems 192 (2021) 103200, 2021.

Barrett, C. B. Carter, M. R. and Timmer, C. P, A Century Long Perspective on Agricultural Development, Am. J. Agric. Econ. 92(2), 2010, pp. 447-468.

Foster, A. D. and Rosenzweig, M. R., Microeconomics of Technology Adoption, Annu Rev Econ. 2(1), 2010, pp. 395-424.

Rogers, E. M, Diffusion of Innovations (Fifth Edition), New York: Free Press, 2003.

Joep W.C. Arts, Ruud T. Frambach, Tammo H.A. Bijmolt, Generalizations on consumer innovation adoption: A meta-analysis on drivers of intention and behavior, Intern. J. of Research in Marketing 28, 2011, pp. 134–144

Acharya, P.; Regmi, P.P.; Gauchan, D.; Bahadur, D.; Bahadur. G, Benefit cost analysis of adoption of small farm machineries for rice cultivation in Nepal, International Journal of Applied Sciences and Biotechnology 8(4), 2020, pp. 448-453.

Gandasari,D; Diena Dwidienawati, dan Larassati Sri Wahyuni, Analysis of Innovation Attributes in The Innovation Adoption of Agricultural Mechanization Technology in Farmers, Journal of Development Communication Vol. 19 (01) 2020, https://doi.org/ 10.46937/19202132705, 2020, pp. 38-51.

Febrimeli, D; Ameilia Zuliyanti Siregar, dan Terima Jaya Laia, Adopsi Petani Dalam Penggunaan Traktor Roda Dua Mengolah Lahan Padi Sawah Di Kecamatan Gomo Kabupaten Nias Selatan Provinsi Sumatera Utara, Jurnal sosial ekonomi pertanian (JSEP), Volume 18, No. 2, Juni 2022, E-ISSN: 2598-5922, 2022, pp. 117-128.

Fujiarta, P. I; I Dewa Gede Raka Sarjana, I Gede Setiawan Adi Putra, Faktor yang Berkaitan dengan Tahapan Adopsi Petani terhadap Teknologi Mesin Rice Transplanter (Kasus pada Enam Subak di Kabupaten Tabanan), E-Jurnal Agribisnis dan Agrowisata, Vol.8, No.1, Januari 2019. ISSN: 230-6525, 2019, pp. 29-38.

Aryal, JP; Dil Bahadur Rahut; Senior Research Fellow/Economist; Ganesh Thapa; and Franklin Simtowe, Mechanisation of small-scale farms in South Asia: Empirical evidence derived from farm households survey, Technology in Society 65 (2021) 101591 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101591, 2021, pp. 1-14.

Rahmana, Md. S; Md. Hayder Khan Sujan; Md. Sherf-Ul-Alam; dan Muhammad Humayun Kabir, Adoption and dis-adoption of farm mechanization in Bangladesh: Case of rice-wheat thresher, Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture, 33(12), doi: 10.9755/ejfa. 2021.v33.i12.2794, 2021, pp. 1000-1007.

Mariano, MJ; Renato Villano, and Euan Fleming. Factors influencing farmers’ adoption of modern rice technologies and good management practices in the Philippines, Agricultural Systems 110 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.03.010, 2012, pp. 41–53.

Ghauri.P., & Gronhaug. K, Research Methods in Business Studies, Harlow, FT/Prentice Hall, 2005.

Field, A. P., Discovering Statistics Using SPSS, Sage Publications Inc, 2005.

Hamed Taherdoost, Validity and Reliability of the Research Instrument; How to Test the Validation of a Questionnaire/Survey in a Research, International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM) Vol. 5, No. 3, 2016, pp. 28-36.

Oluwatayo. J, Validity and reliability issues in educational research, Journal of Educational and Social Research 2, 2012. pp. 391-400.

Straub, D., Boudreau,M.-C & Gefen, D. Validation guidelines for IS positivist research, Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 2004, pp. 380-427.

Fink. A, Survey Research Methods, International Encyclopedia of Education, 2010, pp 152–160. doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-044894-7.00296-7

Brown, T. A, Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, Second Edition, The Guilford Press, 2015.

Mehrens, W.A., & Lehmann, I.J, Measurement and evaluation ineducation and psychology, New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Inc, 1973, pp. 102.

Roberts, P., Priest, H., & Traynor. M, Reliability and validity in research, Nursing Standard, 20(44), 2006, pp. 41–45.

Dewi, S. K., Sudaryanto. A, Validitas dan Reliabilitas Kuisioner Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Perilaku, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Keperawatan Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta, 2020, pp. 73-79

Ishtiaq Ahmed and Sundas Ishtiaq, Reliability and validity: Importance in Medical Research, Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, Oct;71(10), 2021, pp. 2401-2406. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.06-861.

Yusup. F, Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif, Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 2018, pp. 17-23.

Cortina, J. M., What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98, 1993, pp. 98–104.

Purnomo. D, Uji Validitas dan Realibilitas Step Test Sebagai Alat Ukur Keseimbangan Pada Lansia, Jurnal Fisioterapi dan Rehabilitasi, 2.2, 2018, pp. 53-70.

Islam, N. N. M. I, Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Instrumen Kepuasan Pengguna Elektronik Rekam Medis, Jurnal Ilmiah Permas: Jurnal Ilmiah STIKES Kendal, 11.3, 2021, pp. 579-586.

Viladrich, C., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Doval. E, Un Viaje Alrededor de Alfa Y Omega Para Estimar la Fiabilidad de Consistencia Interna, Anales De Psicología, 33(3), 2017, pp. 755-782.