Soybean Supply Response Model In Sub-Optimal Land In Tanjab Timur District: Application Of The Meta Response Function

  • Edison Edison Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jambi,Indonesia
Keywords: Soybean, supply response, production and Meta-Responsemodel.


Soybean production in the Tanjab Timur region has been on a downward trend for nearly a decade. This
requires attention and assessment to find solutions to existing problems. The objective of study is to (1)
evaluate the use of inputs and their effect on production, as well as investigate the capacity of production
factors, such as landand other factors to analyze supply responses; and (2) analyze soybeansupply response
variable to the components of input costs, gross revenue, and other variables, to produce a soybean supply
response model in sub-optimal land types: Application of Meta-Response Functions. This research was
conducted in 2021 on peatland types (sub-optimal). Stratified random sampling is used for the land area.
Appropriate qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods are used, called the Meta Response Function,
which in their application is distinguished from the research objectives, namely in the first objective using the
Production Function Empirical Model, and in the second using the Meta-Response Model. The results
showed that soybean farmers on peatland in the research area respond to changes in input use efficiently. In
terms of output supply, it responds to soybean production. In terms of input demand, many variables are
sensitive to the use of labor, maintenance, and harvesting labor. Production elasticity completes the policy
section of the database foranalysis of the policy impact of applying alternative inputs on soybeansupply and
input demand.


Download data is not yet available.


Edison, Suandi, Fuad M. and Elwamendri. 2017b. Kajian Pengembangan Komoditi Lokal Potensial di Lahan

Gambut Kabupaten Muaro Jambi, Kab. Tanjab Timur danKab.Tanjab Barat. Badan Restorasi Gambut, Jakarta.

Edison, Ratnawaty S. and Nurchaini, D.S. 2017a. Analisis Respon Penawaran KomoditiKedelai di Kabupaten

Tebo Jambi Fakultas Pertanian Unja Jambi.

Edison, 2020. The Effect of Price on Meta Profit Function Model: A Case of Western Indonesia Soybean,

International Journal of Management Studies, 7(1): 20-25.

Guyomard, H., Baudry, M. and Carpenter, A. 2009. Estimating Crop Supply Response in the Presence of Farm

Programmes: Application to the CAP. European Review of Agricultural Economics 23(1):401-420.

Villano, R.A., Donnel, J.C., and Battese, G.E. 2015. An Investigation of ProductionRisk,Risk Preferences and

Technical Efficiency: Evidence from Rainfed Lowland Rice Farms in the Philippines. Working Paper Series in

Agricultural and Resources Economics. Australia.

Hazell, P.B.R. 2001. An Application of Risk Preferences Estimates in Firm- household and Agricultural Sector

Models, American Journal AgriculturalEconomics, 64(3):384-390.

Khan, S.U., Faisal, M.A., Haq, Z.U. and Fahad, S. 2019. Supply Response of Rice Using Time Series Data:

Lessons from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agriculture Science.


Edison and Wahyuni, I. 2020. Acreage Response under Price Policy Program on Corn Production, International

Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 9(3): 345 – 349Aiginger, 2002 Farm-level Acreage Allocation

under Risk. Paper in American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Long Beach. California


Schiff, M. 2001. A Structural View of Policy Issues in Agricultural Development : Comment. American

Journal of Agricultural Economics. 69(1):385-388.

Bakhshoodeh, M. and Shajari, S. 2006. Adoption of New Seed Varieties Under Production Risk: An Application

to Rice in Iran. The International Assoc. ofAgriculturalEconomists Conference, Gold Coast, Australia. Pp. 1-11.

Smith, R., Duffy, P., Novak, J and Wilson, N. 2016. Supply Response of Crops in the Southeast. Southern

Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Atlanta,U.S.A.

International Journal of Science, Technology & Management ISSN: 2722 - 4015

Feder, G., Just R.E., and Zilberman, D. 2002. Adoption of Agricultural Innovation in Developing Countries : A

Survey. Economic Development and Cultural Change.34(2):255-298.

Pitt, M.M. 1999. Farm Level Fertilizer Demand in Java : A Meta Production Function Approach. American

Journal of Agricultural Economics 65(1):502-508.

Nofrizal, 2019. Respon Kedelai Varietas Anjasmoro terhadap Aplikasi Kompos Berbahan Mol Rumpun Bambu

pada Lahan Sub-Optimal. Journal of Applied Agricultural Science and Technology. 3(1):29-40.

Houck, P and Ryan, J. 2003 Weather Risk and The Off-Farm Labour Supply of Agricultural Households in

India. Paper in International Association of AgriculturalEconomists Conference, Gold Coast. Australia. Pp. 12-

Edison, and Wahyuni, I. 2019. Model Respon Penawaran Jagung di Kecamatan Nipah Panjang Kabupaten

Tanjab Timur. Program Pascasarjana Unja. Jambi.

Lu, W., Xi, A., and Ye,J. 2016. Modelling Risk Behaviour of Agricultural ProductioninChinese Small Households.

Poster paper prepared for presentation at InternationalAssociation of Agricultural Economists Conference, Gold

Coast Australia pp 24-30.

Pope, R.D. and Kramer, R.A. 2007. Production Uncertainty and Factor Demands for theCompetitive Firm,

Southern Economics Journal, 46(1):489-501

Lau, L.J. and Yotopoulus, P.A. 1972. Profit, Supply, and Factor Demand Functions. American Journal of

Agricultural Economics,. 54(1):11-18.

Judge, 2004. Fundamental of Econometrics: Theory and Applications. University ofWisconsin Press. U.S.A.

Keeney, R. and Hertel T.W. 2018. Yield Response to Prices: Implications for PolicyModelling. Working Paper

Dept. of Agricultural Economics Purdue University. Pp.1- 36.

Kikuchi, M and Hayami, Y. 1998. Inducement of Institutional Innovations in an AgrarianCommunity, Economic

Dev. And Cultural Change 29(1) : 21-36

How to Cite
Edison, E. (2023). Soybean Supply Response Model In Sub-Optimal Land In Tanjab Timur District: Application Of The Meta Response Function. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 4(1), 73-79.