The Influence of Learning Leadership, Educational Administration Knowledge, Job Satisfaction and Work  Motivation on Organizational Commitment of  the Head of the Early Childhood Education (ECE)  Units in Medan City

Kristianus Mote; Benyamin Situmorang; Darwin

doi:10.46729/ijstm.v2i6.380

Kristianus Mote Doctoral Student State University of Medan, North Sumatera Province, Indonesia.
Benyamin Situmorang Profesor, Promotor State University of Medan, North Sumatera Province, Indonesia.
Darwin Doctor, Co-Promotor State University of Medan, North Sumatera Province, Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v2i6.380

Keywords: Learning Leadership, Educational Administration Knowledge, Job Satisfaction, Work Motivation, Organizational Commitment, Head of the ECE Units.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is (1) to find a model of organizational commitment of the head of the ECE unit which is built based on an associative causal relationship between exogenous variables with an endogenous variable. (2) to test and find direct and indirect effects between exogenous variables with an endogenous variable. This study used a quantitative method with a survey approach. The population was 750 people, and the samples were 238 people. They were collected using a purposive sampling technique based on the sample provisions by Isaac and Michael. Data were collected using questionnaires in the form of a Likert Scale technique with a Merriam technique test instrument. The data were processed using a Path Analysis. The results of the analysis show that (1) the direct influence of learning leadership on the organizational commitment of the head of the ECE units with a path coefficient of 0,119. (2) the direct influence of education administration knowledge on the organizational commitment of the head of the ECE units with a path coefficient of 0,406. (3) the direct influence of job satisfaction on the organizational commitment of the head of the ECE units with a path coefficient of 0,369. (4) the direct influence of work motivation on the organizational commitment of the head of the ECE units with a path coefficient of 0,175. The conclusion is that the organizational commitment model of the head of the ECE units in Medan City has been tested fit with proportional direct and indirect, spurious and unanalyzed effects with a dominant proportional influence that is (1) education administration knowledge of 26,42. (2) job satisfaction of 13,60%. (3) work motivation of 03,06%. (4) learning leadership is 01,41%. The suggestion is that if you want to increase the organizational commitment of the head of the ECE units, it is necessary to first increase the knowledge of educational administration and then be followed by job satisfaction, work motivation and learning leadership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (1991). Organizational Behavior: Concept, Controvercies and Aplicatios. New Jersey: Printice Hall, p. 532.
[2] Schatz, K. & Schatz, L. (1995). Managing by Influence. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc., p. 67.
[3] Luthans, F. (2006). Perilaku Organisasi. Terjemahan Vivin Andhika Yuwono, et. al., Yogyakarta: ANDI, Hlm. 249.
[4] Wijanarko, B. (2015). Kepemimpinan Pembelajaran bagi Kepala Sekolah. Published Date Written by B. Wijanarko, Copyright 2019. Powered by Humas PPPPTK BOE Malang, Hlm. 3.
[5] L. Gullick & Urwick dalam Pidarta dalam Tatang, H. S. (2017). Administrasi Pendidikan. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia, Hlm. 50.
[6] Kepala Bidang PAUD & PNF Dinas Pendidikan Kota Medan. (2018). Supervisi Satuan PAUD Kota Medan.
[7] Manullang, M. (2013). “Pengaruh Pengetahuan Organisasi, Motivasi Berprestasi, Pengambilan Keputusan, dan Komitmen Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Kepala Sekolah (Studi pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama Kota Medan)”. Disertasi. Medan: Universitas Negeri Medan, Hlm. 148.
[8] Siregar, M. (2014). ”Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Pembelajaran, Pengetahuan Manajemen Pendidikan, Motivasi Kerja dan Kepuasan Kerja terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Kepala Sekolah Menengah Pertama Di Kota Medan”. Disertrasi: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan, Hlm. 9., 69-171.
[9] Wau, Y. (2012). “Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Partisipatif, Kemampuan Pribadi, Iklim Kerja, dan Motivasi Berprestasi terhadap Komitmen Afektif kepala Sekolah (Studi Empiris pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama di Pulau Nias)”. Disertasi: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan, Hlm. 37-38.
[10] Siburian, P. (2011). Pengaruh Komunikasi Interpersonal dan Motivasi Berprestasi terhadap Kepuasan Kerja Guru. Medan: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Medan, Hlm. 133.
[11] Adi, B.W. (2013). Analysis of The Effect Schooll Cultural Organization, Leadership and Work Motivation to Organizational Commitment and The Implications to School Principal Performance. Journal of Education and Culture, Vol. 19, No. 2, p. 219, (http://e- resources.perpusnas.go.id/, diakses 30 Juni 2013).
[12] Ismail, A. & Razak, M.R.A. (2016). Effect of Job Satisfaction on Organization Commitment. Journal Management & Marketing, Vol. XIV, No. 1, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, p. 35, (http://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id/, diakses 30 Desember 2016).
[13] Colquit, J.A., LePine, J.A. & Wesson, M.J. (2009). Organizational Behavior: Improving Performance and Commitment in the Workplace, New York: McGraw-Hill., p. 8.
[14] Ivancevich, J.M., Konopaske, R.M. & Matteson, M. T. (2004). Organization Behavior and Management. Seven Edition, Canada: McGraw-Hill, p. 234.
[15] McShane, S.L. & Glinow, M.A.V. (2008). Organizational Behavior. Canada: Irwin/McGraw-Hill, p. 81.
[16] Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, Hlm. 8.
[17] Malhotra, Naresh K. (2010). Riset Pemasaran (Marketing Research) (Edisi 4 Jilid 1). New Jersey, Indonesia: PT. Indeks. Hlm. 81.
[18] Kesuma, I.G.A.W. & Supartha, I.W.G. (2016). Pengaruh Kepemimpinan Transformasional terhadap Komitmen Organisasi dengan Mediasi Organisastional Citizenship Behavior dan Kepuasan Kerja. Jurnal Manajemen Unud, Vol. 5, No. 6, Bali, Hlm. 3701. (http://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id/, diakses 30 Desember 2016).
[19] Pahlawi, L.A.I. & Utomo, A. (2017). The Effect of Communication, Work Satisfaction and eadership on Organizational Commitment and Performance of STIE Adi Unggul Bhirawa (STIE AUB) Surakarta. Journal Educational Management/Administration Accountability. Vol. 1, No. 1, STIE AUB Surakarta, p. 37, (http://e-resources.perpusnas.go.id/, diakses 30 Nopember 2017).
[20] Allen, N.J. & Meyer, J.P. (1997). The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance, dan Normative Commitment to Organization. Journal of Occupational, p. 1-8 & 15.
[21] Kreitner R. & Kinicki, A. (2007). Organizational Behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., p. 225.
[22] Baron, R.A. & Greenberg, J. (1990). Behavior in Organization: Understanding and Managing the Human Side of Work. Third Edition. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon, p. 173.
[23] Newstrom, J.W. (2007). Organizational Behavior: Human Behavior at Work. New York: McGraw Hill Companies, p. 209.