Evaluation Of Smart Village Open Data To Realise Digital Village In Malang Regency

Binti Azizatun Nafi’ah; Kalvin  Edo Wahyudi

doi:10.46729/ijstm.v5i1.1064

Binti Azizatun Nafi’ah Departement of Public Administration, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur, East Java, Indonesia
Kalvin Edo Wahyudi Departement of Public Administration, UPN Veteran Jawa Timur, East Java, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v5i1.1064

Keywords: Evaluation, Smart Village, Open Data and Digital Villalge.

Abstract

Government policies that focus on Open Government Data (OGD) often aim to encourage the provision of interoperable public data to any user, including the lay citizen, through online portals. However, these OGD portals are mostly not updated and the portals do not yet contain data needed by the public such as performance reports, financial reports, activity reports, and other data. This condition occurs in many village governments in Malang District. Researchers focused on evaluating open data in village governments by measuring the principles of open data. Researchers collected data using interviews and observations. Researchers found that the public information disclosure score in Putukrejo village government was 55%. Putukrejo village government's public information disclosure has not been maximised because many elements have not been fulfilled such as data files that have not been uploaded including village regulations, financial reports, and other village documents; timeliness in news updates is also still not optimal; and interactive services and complaints.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bag PDE. (2019, October 19). Website Desa Seluruh Kabupaten Malang Resmi di Launching. https://kominfo.malangkab.go.id/pd/detail?title=website-desa-seluruh-kabupanten-malang-resmi-di-launching

Bonina, C., & Eaton, B. (2020). Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479

Davis, M. (2016). Data and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.02

De Juana-Espinosa, S., & Luján-Mora, S. (2020). Open government data portals in the European Union: A dataset from 2015 to 2017. Data in Brief, 29, 105156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105156

Grabus, S., & Greenberg, J. (2019). The Landscape of Rights and Licensing Initiatives for Data Sharing. Data Sci. J., 18, 29. https://doi.org/10.5334/DSJ-2019-029

Islami, M. J. (2021). Implementasi Satu Data Indonesia: Tantangan dan Critical Success Factors (CSFs). Jurnal Komunika: Jurnal Komunikasi, Media dan Informatika, 10(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.31504/komunika.v10i1.3750

Karamanou, A., Kalampokis, E., & Tarabanis, K. (2023). Integrated statistical indicators from Scottish linked open government data. Data in Brief, 46, 108779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2022.108779

Kempeneer, S., Pirannejad, A., & Wolswinkel, J. (2023). Open government data from a legal perspective: An AI-driven systematic literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 40(3), 101823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101823

Manongga, D. H. F., & Sunarto, H. (2018). Penerapan Dan Perspektif Open Government Data (Ogd) Di Beberapa Negara: Pendekatan Literatur.

Rainie, S. C., Schultz, J. L., Briggs, E., Riggs, P., & Palmanteer-Holder, N. (2017). Data as a Strategic Resource: Self-determination, Governance, and the Data Challenge for Indigenous Nations in the United States. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8, 1. https://doi.org/10.18584/IIPJ.2017.8.2.1

Reggi, L., & Dawes, S. S. (2022). Creating Open Government Data ecosystems: Network relations among governments, user communities, NGOs and the media. Government Information Quarterly, 39(2), 101675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101675

Simonofski, A., Zuiderwijk, A., Clarinval, A., & Hammedi, W. (2022). Tailoring open government data portals for lay citizens: A gamification theory approach. International Journal of Information Management, 65, 102511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2022.102511

Smith, D. E. (2016). Governing data and data for governance: The everyday practice of Indigenous sovereignty. https://doi.org/10.22459/CAEPR38.11.2016.07

Tang, R., & Jiang, J. (2021). Characteristics of Open Government Data (OGD) Around the World: A Country-based Comparative Meta-Analysis. Data and Information Management, 5(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0026

West, K., Hudson, M., & Kukutai, T. (2020). Data Ethics and Data Governance from A Māori World View. https://doi.org/10.1108/s2398-601820200000006005

Yap, L.-M., & Yu, E. (2016). Data sovereignty for the Yawuru in Western Australia. https://doi.org/10.22459/caepr38.11.2016.13

Yiannakoulias, N., Slavik, C. E., Sturrock, S. L., & Darlington, J. C. (2020). Open government data, uncertainty and coronavirus: An infodemiological case study. Social Science & Medicine, 265, 113549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113549

Zhao, Y., Liang, Y., Yao, C., & Han, X. (2022). Key factors and generation mechanisms of open government data performance: A mixed methods study in the case of China. Government Information Quarterly, 39(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101717.