The Economic Development Impact To Environment Quality : Kuznet’s Curve Hyphothesis and Non Linier Regression Approach
Abstract
This study aims was to identify impact of economic development factors to the the environment quality by using Kuznet's Curve Hyphotesis and non linear regression. The determinants studied are indicators of economic development such as Gross Domestic Regional Income (GDRI) of the industrial sector, mining sector, agricultural/plantation /forestry/fishery/livestock sectors, poverty, unemployment and human development index (HDI). While the environmental quality indicators used are Water Quality Index (WQI), Air Quality Index (AQI) and Land Cover Quality Index (LCQI). The data used is secondary data from the Department of Environment, the Department of Energy and Mineral Resources, and also the Central Bureau of Statistics of South Kalimantan Province. Secondary data types used include WQI, AQI, LCQI, GDRI, poverty, unemployment and HDI data for the period 2006 – 2020.
The method used in this study is descriptive quantitatively using Kuznet's Curve hypothesis and non linear regression. The final results obtained from this study include (1) The influence of economic development indicators on environmental quality is in accordance with Kuznet's Curve hypothesis and shows non-linear relationships. (2) Only the unemployment indicator is not identified non-linearly due to the adjusted value of R Square < 0 and the significance of the > 0.05.
Downloads
References
[2]. Zulfikar, R. & P.A. Mayvita (2019). Pengantar Green Economy. Cetakan Pertama, Deepublish-Yogyakarta.
[3]. Özokcu, S., & Özdemir, Ö. (2017). Economic growth, energy, and environmental Kuznets curve. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 639-647.
[4]. Febriana, S., & Herman Cahyo Diartho, N. I. (2019). Hubungan pembangunan ekonomi terhadap kualitas lingkungan hidup di provinsi jawa timur. Jurnal Dinamika Ekonomi Pembangunan, 2(2).
[5]. Churchill, S. A., Inekwe, J., Ivanovski, K., & Smyth, R. (2018). The environmental Kuznets curve in the OECD: 1870–2014. Energy Economics, 75, 389-399.
[6]. Dogan, E., & Inglesi-Lotz, R. (2020). The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(11), 12717-12724.
[7]. Suki, N. M., Sharif, A., Afshan, S., & Suki, N. M. (2020). Revisiting the Environmental Kuznets Curve in Malaysia: The role of globalization in sustainable environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121669.
[8]. Hailemariam, A., Dzhumashev, R., & Shahbaz, M. (2020). Carbon emissions, income inequality and economic development. Empirical Economics, 59(3), 1139-1159.
[9]. Malizia, E., Feser, E. J., Renski, H., & Drucker, J. (2020). Understanding local economic development. Routledge.
[10]. Cheng, C. Y. (2019). China's Economic Development: Growth and Structural Change. Routledge.
[11]. Kahn, H. (2019). World economic development: 1979 and beyond. Routledge.
[12]. Barnes, S. J. (2019). Understanding plastics pollution: The role of economic development and technological research. Environmental Pollution, 249, 812-821.
[13]. Breza, E., Chandrasekhar, A., Golub, B., & Parvathaneni, A. (2019). Networks in economic development. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 35(4), 678-721.
[14]. Bekhet, H. A., Othman, N. S., & Yasmin, T. (2020). Interaction Between Environmental Kuznet Curve and Urban Environment Transition Hypotheses in Malaysia. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(1), 384.
[15]. Zulfa, E., & Resha, M. (2020). Economic determinants of carbon dioxide emissions: A proof of the environmental kuznet curve hypothesis in Asia. TEST Engineering and Management, 82, 6877-6885.
[16]. Robbi, I., Ismail, M., & Hoetoro, A. (2020, June). Environmental Degradation in Indonesia 1969–2016. In 23rd Asian Forum of Business Education (AFBE 2019) (pp. 352-356). Atlantis Press.
[17]. Pratama, Y. P. (2020). KONSENSUS KEMITRAAN GLOBAL PBB (MDGs & SDGs), HIPOTESIS ENVIRONMENTAL KUZNET CURVE (EKC), DAN DEGRADASI KUALITAS UDARA DI INDONESIA PERIODE 1980-2018. Diponegoro Journal of Economics, 9(4).
[18]. Ridwan, I. R. (2010). Dampak industri terhadap lingkungan dan sosial. Jurnal Geografi Gea, 7(2).
[19]. Fachlevi, T. A., Putri, E. I. K., & Simanjuntak, S. M. (2015). Dampak dan Evaluasi Kebijakan Pertambangan Batubara di Kecamatan Mereubo. RISALAH KEBIJAKAN PERTANIAN DAN LINGKUNGAN Rumusan Kajian Strategis Bidang Pertanian dan Lingkungan, 2(2), 170-179.
[20]. Fitriyanti, R. (2018). Pertambangan Batubara: Dampak Lingkungan, Sosial dan Ekonomi. Jurnal Redoks, 1(1).
[21]. Gupito, K. R., & KODOATIE, J. M. (2012). Keterkaitan GDRI Perkapita Dari Sektor Industri, Transportasi, Pertanian dan Kehutanan Terhadap Kualitas Lingkungan Diukur Dari Emisi Co₂ (Studi kasus di: 30 Kab/Kota Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun 2009-2010) (Doctoral dissertation, Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis).
[22]. Gusnita, D. (2010). Green transport: transportasi ramah lingkungan dan kontribusinya dalam mengurangi polusi udara. Berita Dirgantara, 11(2).
[23]. Aly, S. H. (2015). Emisi Transportasi. Penebar Plus+. Jakarta
[24]. Sudantoko, H. D., & Mariyono, J. (2010). Tinjauan Teoritis Pembangunan Pedesaan Yang Berkelanjutan: Pengentasan Kemiskinan dan Perbaikan Kualitas Lingkungan. JEJAK: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Kebijakan, 3(2).
[25]. Ridena, S. (2021). KEMISKINAN DAN LINGKUNGAN: PERSPEKTIF KEMISKINAN DI PERKOTAAN DAN PEDESAAN. Jurnal Litbang Sukowati: Media Penelitian dan Pengembangan, 5(1), 39-48.
[26]. Prasetyoningrum, A. K., & Sukmawati, U. S. (2018). Analisis Pengaruh Indeks Pembangunan Manusia (IPM), Pertumbuhan Ekonomi dan Pengagguran Terhadap Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Equilibrium: Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah, 6(2), 217-240.