Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): May 2026
Open Access
Peer Reviewed

Determining Factors of Village Fund Fraud: Integration of Pentagon Fraud and Morality inStudy of Village Government in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province

Authors

Wahyu Manuhara Putra , Ramonalisa Ramonalisa

DOI:

10.46729/ijstm.v7i3.1428

Published:

2026-05-14

Downloads

Abstract

Fraud in the management of village funds remains a critical issue in public financial governance in Indonesia, along with the increasing budget allocation and complexity of its management. This study aims to analyze the influence of financial pressure, ineffective monitoring, competence, rationalization, village apparatus position, and morality on village fund fraud. This research employs a quantitative approach using primary data collected through questionnaires distributed to 180 village officials in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The analysis technique used is Structural Equation Modeling based on Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) using SmartPLS 3.0. The results show that financial pressure, rationalization, and village apparatus position have a significant positive effect on village fund fraud, while morality has a significant negative effect. Meanwhile, ineffective monitoring and competence do not have a significant effect on fraud. These findings indicate that individual behavioral factors are more dominant in influencing fraud compared to organizational structural factors. Economic pressure and moral justification are the main driving forces, while morality functions as an effective internal control mechanism. The implications of this study highlight the importance of strengthening integrity and ethical values among village officials as a primary strategy in fraud prevention. In addition, this study contributes theoretically by integrating the fraud pentagon with the morality variable and provides practical contributions for policymakers in improving village financial governance.

Keywords:

Financial Pressure, Ineffective Monitoring, Rationalization, Village Apparatus Position dan Morality.

References

[1]. Agustina, D., & Pratomo, D. (2019). The influence of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization on village fund fraud. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Finance, 16(2), 123–138.

[2]. Aini, N., Zulaikha, & Hadiprajitno, B. (2017). Analysis of factors influencing financial statement fraud. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 6(3), 1–10.

[3]. Apriani, N. (2020). The influence of diamond fraud on village fund management fraud. Multiparadigma Accounting Journal, 11(2), 345–360.

[4]. Budiartini, NP, Rencana, IK, & Dewi, NP (2019). The influence of position and power on the tendency to commit fraud. E-Journal of Accounting, Udayana University, 28(2), 1456–1478.

[5]. Clinard, M. B., & Cressey, D. R. (1954). Other People's Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. In American Sociological Review (Vol. 19, Issue 3, p. 362). https://doi.org/10.2307/2087778

[6]. Crowe Howarth. (2011). Why the fraud triangle is no longer enough. Crowe LLP. Fahjar, A. (2019). The influence of internal control systems on fraud in the public sector. Scientific Journal of Accounting, 14(1), 56–67.

[7]. Fahjar. (2019). Determinants of Village Fund Fraud: Pentagon Fraud Analysis (Empirical Study on Village Government Apparatus in the Village Government Scope in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province). 113.

[8]. Fathmaningrum, ES, & Anggarani, D. (2021). Analysis of factors influencing fraud in the village government sector. Journal of Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 22–31.

[9]. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares: Concepts, techniques, and applications using SmartPLS 3.0. Semarang: Diponegoro University Publishing Agency.

[10]. Honorati, A., & Pesudo, D. (2019). The influence of pressure and opportunity on village fund fraud. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 23(1), 45–58.

[11]. Indonesian Corruption Watch. (2024). Report on the Results of Monitoring Corruption Trends in 2023. In ICW (September). Indonesia Corruption Watch.

[12]. Irphani, A. (2017). The influence of pressure, opportunity, and rationalization on financial reporting fraud. Journal of Accounting Science and Research, 6(5), 1–20.

[13]. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

[14]. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The Philosophy of Moral Development: Moral Stages and The Idea of Justice. Harper & Row.

[15]. Lahaya, IA (2017). The influence of individual morality on the tendency to commit accounting fraud. Journal of Economics and Business, 20(2), 89–102.

[16]. Maulina, R., Sari, R., & Putra, D. (2019). The influence of morality on accounting fraud in the public sector. Journal of Public Accounting, 10(1), 67–80.

[17]. Njonjie, P., Kalangi, L., & Budiarso, N. (2019). The influence of competence and morality on fraud in village financial management. Journal of Accounting and Auditing Research, 10(2), 112–124.

[18]. Priyastiwi, N., & Setyowati, E. (2022). Determinants of village fund fraud: A fraud diamond approach. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 24(1), 15–29.

[19]. Putra, MA, & Rahayu, NT (2019). Diamond Theory Fraud Analysis in Village Fund Management in Guntur District, Demak Regency. Proceedings of the Unimus National Seminar, 2, 240–248.

[20]. Putra, WM (2019, November). Analysis of Financial Fraud Using the Fraud Diamond Model with Corporate Governance as the Moderating Variable. In 5th International Conference on Accounting and Finance (ICAF 2019) (pp. 163-169). Atlantis Press.

[21]. Putri, NA, Rahmawati, & Sari, M. (2017). The effect of internal control on fraud in the public sector. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 18(1), 45–58.

[22]. Rahi, S. (2017). Research Design and Methods: A Systematic Review of Research Paradigms, Sampling Issues and Instruments Development International Journal of Economics &. 6(2). https://doi.org/10.4172/2162-6359.1000403

[23]. Rahimah, L., Mardani, R., & Wahono, B. (2018). The influence of individual morality on the tendency to commit accounting fraud. Journal of Management Research, 7(1), 23–34.

[24]. Suryandari, D., & Pratama, A. (2021). Pentagon fraud analysis of financial statement fraud. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 25(1), 56–68.

[25]. Widjajanti, K., & Wahyuni, S. (2019). The influence of morality on fraud in the public sector. Journal of Accounting and Governance, 3(2), 89–102.

[26]. Wirakusuma, IGB, & Setiawan, PE (2019). The Influence of Internal Control, Competency, and Locus of Control on Accounting Fraud Tendency. E-Journal of Accounting, 26(2), 1545–1569.

[27]. Wolfe, D.T., & Hermanson, D.R. (2004). The Fraud Diamond : Considering the Four Elements of Fraud. CPA Journal, 74(12), 38–42. https://doi.org/DOI:

[28]. Zulaikha, & Hadiprajitno, B. (2016). Analysis of factors influencing village fund fraud. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Finance, 13(2), 145–160.

Author Biographies

Wahyu Manuhara Putra, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Ramonalisa Ramonalisa, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Author Origin : Indonesia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Manuhara Putra, W., & Ramonalisa, R. (2026). Determining Factors of Village Fund Fraud: Integration of Pentagon Fraud and Morality inStudy of Village Government in the Special Region of Yogyakarta Province. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 7(3), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.46729/ijstm.v7i3.1428