A Comparative Analysis of Financial Performance and Stability Between Indonesian Sharia Bank (BSI) and Bank Mandiri From 2020 to 2024
DOI:
10.46729/ijstm.v7i1.1401Published:
2026-01-20Downloads
Abstract
This study aims to assess and describe the financial performance of Bank Mandiri and Indonesian Sharia Bank (BSI) based on the RGEC analysis results during the period 2020–2024. The research method used is quantitative with a descriptive quantitative approach. The population of the study includes all banks registered and operating in Indonesia during the 2020–2024 period, or more specifically certain banks such as conventional banks and sharia banks. The samples selected are Bank Mandiri as the representative of conventional banks and Indonesian Sharia Bank (BSI) as the representative of sharia banks for the 2020–2024 period. The sample selection is based on relevance, availability of data, and representation of each bank type. The results show that Bank Mandiri demonstrates superior performance compared to Indonesian Sharia Bank (BSI) on most key RGEC indicators. Bank Mandiri maintains asset quality with significantly lower NPF, as well as records better efficiency in asset and capital utilization through higher ROA and ROE. Additionally, Mandiri’s operating margin (NOM) is much stronger and more stable. Although both banks have very strong capital adequacy (CAR) and good governance (GCG), operational efficiency (BOPO) remains a challenge for both, even though BSI shows slightly better BOPO figures. Overall, Mandiri is more aggressive in financing distribution and efficient in generating profit, while BSI is still in the process of post-merger stabilization with reasonably healthy performance but with room for improvement in operating margin and efficiency.
References
[1] Abdullah, N. A. H., & Ismail, S. (2020). Financial performance of Islamic and conventional banks: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(9), 2059–2080. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-09-2019-0342
[2] Abdul-Rahman, A., Haneef, M. A., & Ahmad, N. H. (2022). Earnings stability and profitability of Islamic banks: Evidence from dual banking economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 77, 101609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101609
[3] Ahmed, A., Mollah, S., & Bhuyan, R. (2021). Risk, capital, and performance of Islamic and conventional banks: International evidence. Finance Research Letters, 41, 102048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102048
[4] Azmi, W., & Haque, M. M. (2021). The stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: A global evidence. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 14(2), 230–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-09-2020-0213
[5] Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency, and stability. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(2), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.015
[6] Bitar, M., Pukthuanthong, K., & Walker, T. (2018). Efficiency in Islamic vs. conventional banking: Evidence from the global financial crisis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 97, 155–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.10.011
[7] Farooq, M. U., & Satt, H. (2021). Corporate governance and risk management in Islamic and conventional banks: Comparative insights. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 21(7), 1385–1404. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-02-2020-0087
[8] Hassan, M. K., Aliyu, S., Paltrinieri, A., & Khan, A. (2020). A comparative study of Islamic and conventional banks’ performance in the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Business Research, 117, 560–570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.035
[9] Kassim, S. H. (2016). Islamic finance and economic growth: The Malaysian experience. Research in International Business and Finance, 38, 427–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2016.02.008
[10] Pappas, V., Ongena, S., Izzeldin, M., & Fuertes, A. M. (2016). A survival analysis of Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 65, 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.03.015
[11] Rosly, S. A. (2020). Islamic banking efficiency: Comparative insights and implications. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 13(5), 821–836.
[12] Sutrisno, T., Rahman, F., & Prasetyo, A. (2023). The impact of Bank Syariah Indonesia merger on financial performance and market perception. International Journal of Islamic Finance, 15(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIF-04-2023-0072
[13] Yuliani, A., & Haron, R. (2022). Financial sustainability of Islamic and conventional banks in Indonesia: Post-merger evidence. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(12), 2378–2396.
[14] Hanafi, M. M., & Halim, A. (2021). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (Edisi Kelima). UPP STIM YKPN.
[15] Kasmir. (2022). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (Edisi Revisi). Rajawali Pers.
[16] Pandia, F. (2021). Manajemen Dana dan Kinerja Bank. Mitra Wacana Media.
[17] Komite Nasional Kebijakan Governance (KNKG). (2021). Pedoman Umum Good Corporate Governance Indonesia. Jakarta: KNKG.
[18] Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). (2021). Penilaian tingkat kesehatan bank umum dengan metode RGEC. Jakarta: OJK. Retrieved from https://www.ojk.go.id/id/regulasi/perbankan
[19] Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2022). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Nomor 17/POJK.03/2022 tentang Penerapan Manajemen Risiko bagi Bank Umum. Jakarta: OJK.
[20] Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Laporan Profil Industri Perbankan Indonesia (LPI). Jakarta: OJK..
License
Copyright (c) 2026 International Journal of Science, Technology & Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Downloads
How to Cite
