CEO Psychological Characteristics And Sustainability Report Disclosure In Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to test the upper echelon theory by examining how CEO narcissism and optimism affect sustainability report disclosure. This study uses panel data regression with Eviews 12 on sample data of 238 companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX) that published sustainability and annual reports 2021-2023. Frim size, firm age, leverage, and profitability are included as control variables. The results indicate that CEO narcissism negatively influence on sustainability report disclosure while CEO optimism positively influence on sustainability report disclosure. The presence of the firm age control variable changes the findings. CEO characteristics no longer affect sustainability report disclosure after the addition of the company age control variable in the regression model. The results of this study has practical implications for the board of commissioners and shareholders namely the importance of considering psychological aspects, such as narcissistic traits and the level of CEO optimism, when selecting and compiling the structure of the company's board of directors.
Downloads
References
KLHK, “Indonesia Serukan 3 Isu Lingkungan dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan di AALCO ke-61,” Siaran Pers Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. [Online]. Available: https://www.menlhk.go.id/news/indonesia-serukan-3-isu-lingkungan-dan-pembangunan-berkelanjutan-di-aalco-ke-61/
Andreas and A. Zarefar, “Corporte Governance and Sustainability in Indonesia: The Moderating Role of Intitutional Ownership,” J. Din. Akunt., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 98–109, 2022.
G. I. Edo et al., “Impact of environmental pollution from human activities on water, air quality and climate change,” Ecol. Front., no. December 2023, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ecofro.2024.02.014.
Mediaindonesia.com, “Panja Limbah DPR Temukan Limbah B3 di Pabrik Mie Instan Medan,” Mediaindonesia.com. [Online]. Available: https://mediaindonesia.com/politik-dan-hukum/247364/panja-limbah-dpr-temukan-limbah-b3-di-pabrik-mie-instan-medan
Trendasia.com, “Masyarakat Sampaikan Laporan Fakta Kerusakan Lingkungan di IPO Perdana Anak Usaha Harita Group,” Trendasia. [Online]. Available: https://trendasia.org/masyarakat-sampaikan-laporan-fakta-kerusakan-lingkungan-di-ipo-perdana-anak-usaha-harita-group/
B. Tjahjadi, N. Soewarno, and F. Mustikaningtiyas, “Good corporate governance and corporate sustainability performance in Indonesia: A triple bottom line approach,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 3, p. e06453, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06453.
A. Qa’dan, M. Bassam, Suwaidan, and M. Said, “Board composition, ownership structure and corporate social responsibility disclosure: the case of Jordan,” Soc. Responsib. J., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 28–46, 2019, doi: 10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0225.
M. Shahbaz, A. S. Karaman, M. Kilic, and A. Uyar, “Board attributes, CSR engagement, and corporate performance: What is the nexus in the energy sector?,” Energy Policy, vol. 143, no. May, p. 111582, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111582.
N. Hussain, U. Rigoni, and R. P. Orij, “Corporate Governance and Sustainability Performance: Analysis of Triple Bottom Line Performance,” J. Bus. Ethics, vol. 149, no. 2, pp. 411–432, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s10551-016-3099-5.
C. Mackenzie, “Boards, incentives and corporate social responsibility: The case for a change of emphasis,” Corp. Gov. An Int. Rev., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 935–943, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00623.x.
Y. Shahab, C. G. Ntim, Y. Chen, F. Ullah, H. X. Li, and Z. Ye, “Chief executive officer attributes, sustainable performance, environmental performance, and environmental reporting: New insights from upper echelons perspective,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 1–16, 2020, doi: 10.1002/bse.2345.
Hambrick and Mason, “Upper Echelons : of Reflection The Its Organization as reflection of its Top managers,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 193–206, 1984, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/258434
M. K. Chin, D. C. Hambrick, and L. K. Treviño, “Political Ideologies of CEOs: The Influence of Executives’ Values on Corporate Social Responsibility,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 197–232, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0001839213486984.
G. Yukl and D. D. Van Fleet, “Theory and research on leadership in organizations. In M. D. Dunette & L. M. Hough (Eds.),” Handb. Ind. Organ. Psychol., vol. 3, no. January 1992, pp. 147–197, 1992.
Winardi, Motivasi dan Pemotivasian dalam Manajemen. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, 2004.
P. N. Githaiga and J. K. Kosgei, “Board characteristics and sustainability reporting: a case of listed firms in East Africa,” Corp. Gov., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 3–17, 2023, doi: 10.1108/CG-12-2021-0449.
N. Lassoued and I. Khanchel, Voluntary CSR disclosure and CEO narcissism: the moderating role of CEO duality and board gender diversity, vol. 17, no. 3. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s11846-022-00555-3.
M. Al-Shammari, A. Rasheed, and H. A. Al-Shammari, “CEO narcissism and corporate social responsibility: Does CEO narcissism affect CSR focus?,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 104, no. May 2018, pp. 106–117, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.005.
Z. Yue, H. Liang, X. Qin, Y. Ge, N. Xiang, and E. Liu, “Optimism and survival: health behaviors as a mediator—a ten-year follow-up study of Chinese elderly people,” BMC Public Health, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022, doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13090-3.
C. S. Carver, M. F. Scheier, and S. C. Segerstrom, “Optimism,” Clin. Psychol. Rev., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 879–889, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.006.
T. H. H. Nguyen, M. H. Elmagrhi, C. G. Ntim, and Y. Wu, “Environmental performance, sustainability, governance and financial performance: Evidence from heavily polluting industries in China,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 2313–2331, 2021, doi: 10.1002/bse.2748.
F. L. Kind, J. Zeppenfeld, and R. Lueg, “The impact of chief executive officer narcissism on environmental, social, and governance reporting,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 4448–4466, 2023, doi: 10.1002/bse.3375.
M. Al-Shammari, A. A. Rasheed, and S. N. Banerjee, “Are All Narcissistic CEOs Socially Responsible? An Empirical Investigation of an Inverted U-Shaped Relationship Between CEO Narcissism and Corporate Social Responsibility,” Gr. Organ. Manag., vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 612–646, 2022, doi: 10.1177/10596011211040665.
D. C. Hambrick, “Upper Echelons Theory,” Palgrave Encycl. Strateg. Manag., 2013, doi: 10.1057/9781137294678.0713.
A. Rudyanto and S. V. Siregar, “The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance on the sustainability report quality.,” Int. J. Ethics Syst., vol. 34(2), pp. 233–249, 2018.
A. Chatterjee and D. C. Hambrick, “It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance,” Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 351–386, 2007, doi: 10.2189/asqu.52.3.351.
B. Awuah, H. Elbardan, and H. Yazdifar, “Chief executive officer narcissism, power and sustainable development goals reporting: An empirical analysis,” Bus. Strateg. Environ., no. July, pp. 1–21, 2024, doi: 10.1002/bse.3889.
O. V. Petrenko, F. Aime, J. Ridge, and A. Hill, “Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 262–279, 2016, doi: 10.1002/smj.2348.
B. Walgito, Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andi Offest, 1977.
C. Arena, S. Bozzolan, and G. Michelon, “Environmental Reporting: Transparency to Stakeholders or Stakeholder Manipulation? An Analysis of Disclosure Tone and the Role of the Board of Directors,” Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 346–361, 2015, doi: 10.1002/csr.1350.
M. De-Visser and D. Faemas, “Exploration and exploitation within firms: the impact of CEO s’ cognitive style on incremental and radical innovation performance,” Creat. Innov. Manag., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 359–372, 2015, doi: doi:10.1111/caim.12137.
N. Anas, “Komunikasi antara Kognitif dan Kemampuan Berbahasa,” EUNOIA (Jurnal Pendidik. Bhs. Indones., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2021, [Online]. Available: http://jurnaltarbiyah.uinsu.ac.id/index.php/eunoia/article/view/997/775
Y. Kinari, “Properties of expectation biases: Optimism and overconfidence,” J. Behav. Exp. Financ., vol. 10, pp. 32–49, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jbef.2016.02.003.
D. Adhariani and E. du Toit, “Readability of sustainability reports: evidence from Indonesia,” J. Account. Emerg. Econ., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 621–636, 2020, doi: 10.1108/JAEE-10-2019-0194.
T. Janggu, F. Darus, M. M. Zain, and Y. Sawani, “Does Good Corporate Governance Lead to Better Sustainability Reporting? An Analysis Using Structural Equation Modeling,” Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 145, pp. 138–145, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.06.020.
I. Ali, S. Lodhia, and A. K. Narayan, “Value creation attempts via photographs in sustainability reporting: a legitimacy theory perspective,” Meditari Account. Res., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 247–263, 2020, doi: 10.1108/MEDAR-02-2020-0722.
C. Ham, M. Lang, N. Seybert, and S. Wang, “CFO narcissism and financial reporting quality,” J. Account. Res., vol. 55, pp. 1089–1135, 2017.
H. Frith, Graphology. Steinerbooks, 1980.
Y. R. Tausczik and J. W. Pennebaker, “The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods,” J. Lang. Soc. Psychol., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 24–54, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0261927X09351676.
H. Bassyouny, T. Abdelfattah, and L. Tao, “Beyond narrative disclosure tone: The upper echelons theory perspective,” Int. Rev. Financ. Anal., vol. 70, p. 101499, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2020.101499.
M. Mardani and R. Fallah, “Comparison of Financial Leverage Ratio before and after the Use of Off-Balance Sheet Financing in Firms Listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange,” Dutch J. Financ. Manag., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 4–8, 2019, doi: 10.29333/djfm/5829.
A. Rafique and A. Noor, “ESG Disclosure and Firm Performance: A Personality Perspective of CEO Narcissism?,” vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 80–95, 2024.
W. J. Wales, P. C. Patel, and G. T. Lumpkin, “In Pursuit of Greatness : CEO Narcissism , Entrepreneurial Orientation , and Firm Performance Variance,” no. September, 2013, doi: 10.1111/joms.12034.
G. Michelon, M. Rodrigue, and E. Trevisan, “The marketization of a social movement: Activists, shareholders and CSR disclosure,” Accounting, Organ. Soc., vol. 80, p. 101074, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.aos.2019.101074.
P. H. Ting, “Do large firms just talk corporate social responsibility? - The evidence from CSR report disclosure,” Financ. Res. Lett., vol. 38, no. February 2019, p. 101476, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101476.
J. Guan, “Is Narcissism a Bad Sign? Three Empirical Analyses of Narcissistic Audit Committee Chairs,” niversity Southampt. Res. Repos., 2024, [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.69591
S. Kayed, A. H. Ramadan, A. Morshed, H. Alshurafat, and R. Al-Zyoudi, “The effect of board of directors’ characteristics on disclosing tone in the annual reports: evidence from Amman stock exchange,” Discov. Sustain., vol. 5, no. 1, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43621-024-00509-7.
R. Mehmood, S. Alawi, and I. Ahmad, “CEO Optimism, Accounting Conservatism and Earnings Management of Listed Manufacturing Firms: Evidence from Asian Emerging Economies,” FWU J. Soc. Sci., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 14–24, 2024, doi: 10.51709/19951272/Fall2024/2.
M. Bouzguenda and A. Jarboui, “The role of the psychological and behavioral profile of the CEO in assessing the dimensions of the corporate social responsibility,” SN Bus. Econ., vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1–27, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s43546-024-00712-8.
D. Dissanayake, C. Tilt, and M. Xydias-Lobo, “Sustainability reporting by publicly listed companies in Sri Lanka,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 129, pp. 169–182, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.086.
D. Cormier, M. Ledoux, and M. Magnan, “The Informational Contribution of Social and Environmental Disclosures for Investors,” Manag. Decis., vol. Vol. 49 No, pp. 1276–1304, 2011.
R. Gray, R. Kouhy, and S. Lavers, “Pelaporan Sosial dan Lingkungan Perusahaan Tinjauan Literatur dan Studi Longitudinal Pengungkapan Inggris,” Accounting, Audit. Account. J., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 47–77, 1995.
Copyright (c) 2025 International Journal of Science, Technology & Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.