Smart City Development Strategy of Wonogiri Regency
Abstract
Technology transformation in the smart city concept begins with the implementation of policy transfer to local governments. Wonogiri Regency is one of the districts that implement smart city policy transfer from the central smart city policy. So it is necessary to analyse regional strategies in implementing smart cities. Regional smart city strategy analysis is an analysis carried out to assess the strengths weaknesses opportunities and threats in order to get a picture of the capacity and capability of the region in implementing smart city development programmes. This research aims to analyse the smart city development strategy of Wonogiri Regency. With the regional strategy analysis, Wonogiri Regency can map the right programme according to the dimensions of smart city. So that the implementation of this smart city can run smoothly in accordance with the goals of the Indonesian smart city movement. This study took a locus in Wonogiri Regency, which has a sufficient SPBE index and was chosen to be one of the implementers of the Indonesian smart city movement. Researchers used qualitative methods to analyse the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of Wonogiri Regency to develop appropriate strategies for these conditions. Researchers found that the smart city strategy is combined with other strategies to solve the problems of the Wonogiri community. The smart city action plan is formed from action plans for smart governance, smart environment, smart society; smart living; smart economy, and smart branding. The action plan must adjust to the strategy formed. The focus of the Action Plan from Wonogiri Regency is to provide integrated services ranging from data to applications.
Downloads
References
L. Anthopoulos and C. G. Reddick, “Understanding electronic government research and smart city: A framework and empirical evidence,” Information Polity, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 99–117, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-15037.
T. Nam and T. A. Pardo, “Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context,” Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 185–194, doi: 10.1145/2072069.2072100.
O. Kolotouchkina, C. L. Barroso, and J. L. M. Sánchez, “Smart cities, the digital divide, and people with disabilities,” Cities, vol. 123, p. 103613, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103613.
Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi, “Hasil Evaluasi SPBE Tahun 2019 Pemerintah Kabupaten Wonogiri,” 2020. Accessed: Sep. 25, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://spbe.go.id/moneval/
L. Mora, P. Gerli, L. Ardito, and A. Messeni Petruzzelli, “Smart city governance from an innovation management perspective: Theoretical framing, review of current practices, and future research agenda,” Technovation, vol. 123, p. 102717, May 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102717.
A. A. Guenduez and I. Mergel, “The role of dynamic managerial capabilities and organizational readiness in smart city transformation,” Cities, vol. 129, p. 103791, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2022.103791.
M. Gasco-Hernandez, G. Nasi, M. Cucciniello, and A. M. Hiedemann, “The role of organizational capacity to foster digital transformation in local governments: The case of three European smart cities,” Urban Governance, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 236–246, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ugj.2022.09.005.
L. Li, A. Taeihagh, and S. Y. Tan, “What factors drive policy transfer in smart city development? Insights from a Delphi study,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 84, p. 104008, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2022.104008.
J. Paskaleva, C. Evans, T. Martin, D. Linjordet, A. Yang, and Karvonen, “Data governance in the sustainable smart city,” Informatics, vol. 4, no. 4, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.3390/informatics4040041.
R. A. Sharif and S. Pokharel, “Smart City Dimensions and Associated Risks: Review of literature,” Sustainable Cities and Society, vol. 77, p. 103542, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103542.
S. V. Faber, A. Rehm, F. Hernandez-Mendez, and Matthes, “Modeling and visualizing smart city mobility business ecosystems: Insights from a case study,” Information, vol. 9, no. 11, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/info9110270.
M. U. Preston and R. Bull, “Citizen engagement for Co-creating low carbon smart cities: practical lessons from nottingham city council in the UK,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 24, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13246615.
C. M. T. Lai and A. Cole, “Measuring progress of smart cities: Indexing the smart city indices,” Urban Governance, p. S2664328622000699, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ugj.2022.11.004.
D. Landsbergen, A. Girth, and A. Westover-Muñoz, “Governance rules for managing smart city information,” Urban Governance, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 221–231, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ugj.2022.05.003.
Offenhuber, “Offenhuber, The platform and the bricoleur—improvisation and smart city initiatives in Indonesia,” Environ. Plan. B: Urban Anal. City Sci., vol. 46, no. 8, pp. 1565–1580, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808319865749.
Z. R. Mulla and V. R. Krishnan, “Impact of employment on newcomer’s values: Role of supervisor’s transformational leadership,” IIMB Management Review, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 228–241, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2022.09.001.
L. Rizkinazwara, “Mengenal Lebih Dekat Konsep Smart City dalam Pembangunan Kota.” Accessed: Feb. 23, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2020/10/mengenal-lebih-dekat-konsep-smart-city-dalam-pembangunan-kota/
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th Edition ed.). California: Sage Publishing, 2018.
Copyright (c) 2023 International Journal of Science, Technology & Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.